Part:(8)
Problems with understanding ... then it enters the intestine through the bile duct to make this food infiltrate.
Next to➡
Previous
The Darwinists never thought that Melanin, the protein that gives the eye its color, provides extra protection by distilling light from the rays that damage the retina, nor do Darwinists understand how Melanin decides to do so. picks up .
Darwinists never believe that the Stone Age is a lie.
Darwinists never teach that while Darwinists claim that the first humans were alive, there is evidence that people in those days were actually acquainted with a civilization that It doesn't matter what our age is.
He used forks and spoons, welcomed guests and lived a regular life.
Darwinists never thought that buttons, which were made of bones, were used ten thousand years before Christ.
I used to come, showing that people were also familiar with chests and meet.
Darnestists never think about how the 95,000-year-old flute is a proof that people who lived thousands of years ago loved music, and there is nothing that can separate the early people from the modern ones.
Even dartsists do not know how the people of Christ used copper tools (agricultural implements) ten thousand years ago, which indicates that the society of that time must have known about the reversal of metals.
And he must have known how copper was extracted from the metal between the rocks, and then they were cast according to their meaning. 91
Step:2
Problems Understanding ... Dar Tests never consider how the rocks used to be glazed.
He said that they belonged to the Stone Age and claimed that they were the pioneers of early civilization and culture - no conclusion could be drawn in terms of Polish.
However, the polish could not remain in good condition for thousands of years.
Besides, it was not the polish but the glazing that was made on the rock using steel tools. Or a job that requires extraordinary intelligence.
Darwinists never question how a metal bowl was made of a rusty zinc and an abundance of silver over a million years ago, as reported in Scientific American Magazine (1852).
It has a bouquet of flowers with bunches of grapes and other designs with an advanced workmanship pattern.
This embroidery highlighted a culture that was capable of crafting metals.
The Darwinists also do not think that a heat of 6,1084.5 is required to obtain a copper-backed metal, which indicates that Dinke's injury satisfies that the back of the armpits.
The conditions required were favorable.
That is to say, a furnace should have been built to maintain the heat, and that equipment such as ladles (La Nabi Doni) and the sixth acquiring metal should have been present from the kiln (Kiln) during this time.
For all intents and purposes, at that time people lived in the distant past, cannot be taken as a primitive human being.
(For further explanation, see Haroon Yahya's book - A Historical Lie Stone Age, Istanbul Global Publishing, 2006) Darwinists never mind Two billion eighty million years ago, an iron bowl that is a million years old in style, the remains of textiles 27,000 years 92
Step:3
Problems in understanding ... Old and many metal remains shake that in some other places in Europe people used to melt metals like Mbenisium and Platinum thousands of years ago.
Absolutely, the delusions of the early evolutionists about human beings have become meaningless.
Darwinists never acknowledge how all discoveries concerning ancient humans have been ignored by evolutionary scientists or hidden in museum basements.
The histories that have been presented to the public about early societies are purely evolutionary fictional tales of evolutionists, rather than raw human history.
Darwinists have never considered how surgery was performed in an age that people refer to as the Stone Age, and that discoveries about the decoration and raw materials for dyeing come from excavations, they say.
According to them, they were related to a time when man had no knowledge of craftsmanship.
All these are important evidences that there was no period in human history as a primitive age.
Darwinists have never considered how archeological discoveries openly show that man has a cultural understanding from the day he first came into existence in this world.
From time to time there has been an evolutionary process of increasing, decreasing and irregular change. Instead, they have been representing the presence of cultural development and change.
Darwinists never consider that archeological remains, which were left behind by the people of the past, are incompatible with descriptive and biological remains.
Darwinists never consider the existence of the Soul; an authoritarian movement created by physical and material philosophy gradually becomes stronger and broader.
Thus, until the end of time, through material philosophy 93
Step:4
Problems that are understood ... at such a point that these philosophers deny the existence of God (Badi-ul-Zaman Saeed Narsi).
The ideas that arise from the electrical impulses in their seeds.
They never directly observe the external sources of any idea.
Darwinists never realize that the sounds they make, the scenes they see and the fragrances they smell are just a collection of ideas, formed in their messages, and that they don't even prove it.
The true existence of these ideas can be found in this external world.
Darwinists never understand that there is no answer in terms of coincidence.
Darwinists never understand that materialism cannot explain what is in the human mind and cannot pay attention to the higher consciousness of human beings, of consciousness.
The Darwinists also do not appreciate that the human sentinel is the most complex structure of the world and that what they believe to have been brought by chance presents us with a completely clean and clear world, and that The hand-held mechanism cannot be imitated by the unconscious gem in any way, whatever it may be.
But if you admit that there is a consciousness of something that comes from the sender (and not exactly what everyone does and the performance of the sender you get a sample that is consistent with a deliberate experience, there is Still a problem.
Why should the performance of a set of neurons be felt in terms of anything? Why does the world feel the back of your finger?
Why does a red rose look red? .... 94 (New Scientist Magazine)
Step:5
Problems in Understanding ... Darwinists claim that Sent came into being by chance, however it works hundreds of times faster, in a much more complex way than the fastest computer in the competition, and His work cannot be replicated electronically.
Darwinists never understand that the attributes that make a person human, such as emotions, thoughts, feelings, love and beliefs, do not result in the functioning of the neurons in the transmission, and that there can be no material explanation for the diagnosis.
Darwinists never understand that there is a human soul that enjoys, marvels, thinks, analyzes, evaluates, recognizes the sounds it hears, and is happy to see the scent of roses and smell it.
Do Darwinists never understand that materialism is useless in the light of the soul, that there is enough evidence for its existence, and that even evolution cannot explain the existence of the soul.
Darwinists never understand that concepts such as love, loyalty, friendship and honesty can never be understood.
In material terms, and the unrealistic mechanisms of evolution, Miss cannot shed any light on them.
A coding system always produces an immaterial intelligence method. Physical matter cannot produce an information code.
All observations indicate that every piece of creative information represents some effort put in and can be detected or given by a personal Idea giver who uses his own free will and who is gifted with an intelligent mind. So no well-known natural law, no well-known method, and no general series of events that evoke information by itself in matter.
(Professor Wernergitt, Director German Franks and Institute of Technology) Darwinists never understand that coincidences have no consciousness, and cannot produce conscious human beings who can hear, see, smell and touch, and
Step:6
Problems in Understanding ... Understand beauty as workmanship and science.
Darwinists never understand that the way in which the noble ideas that are formed by the transmission of electrical signals in complete darkness, is a miracle that cannot be explained in terms of coincidence.
Darwins don't even understand the structure of the sender, how and where a mechanism like memory is revealed when it is expected and needed.
Even Darwinists do not understand how it happens that while they are asleep, they dream of an easy light which shines with the radiance of the sun's rays.
They feel cold in dreams and also feel themselves from the rain, can smell the enchanting scent of a rose and can eat very tasty foods which they had not eaten even before they were full.
In the darkness of sending inside the node.
The information contained in the Genetic Code, like all information or messages, is not devoid of substance.
The message or meaning is in the genetic code and is immaterial and cannot be changed into physical or chemical properties.
(Dean Overman)
Darwinists never admit that all their claims of the last 160 years have been disproved.
But in exactly the same proportion as the method of finding remains on a large piano, there should have been a reasonable number of intermediate species, whatever they were, and they should have been in largenumbers in the fossil record.
Why, then, is not every geological structure and every layer of the earth filled with these intermediate forms?
Geology of the Earth with certainty Some of these clear gradual organic chains 96
Step:7
Problems in understanding ... Couldn't reveal.
May arise against And the most open and serious objection that my Darwinist theory of evolution (Charles Darwin) would never consider is that there is not a single intermediate form in the remnants that could substantiate their theory of evolution.
Darwinists never consider how a large part of the earth's crust has been examined, and that despite all the fossils that have been excavated and the scientific developmental information that has come up, evolutionists still have one such example.
Couldn't get what they could have given as an allegory. Darwinists never acknowledge that comparing fossils of millions of years ago with the present living similarities is an expression of the hollowness of evolutionary theory.
Darwinists do not all agree that every piece of research they do is in order to support the theory of evolution.
But he ends up in a complete mess.
With the facts as stated, the fossils have been on the record unchanged for millions of years, and with the facts revealed by science, it is clear that Allah, the Lord of Glory, has created the whole universe and all living beings.
Darwinists believe that the so-called Living Fossils prove that this evolutionary process took place on Earth, but in reality, these fossils reveal a physical history that is in stark contrast to Darwin's theory.
Way proven (6 97)
Step:8
Problems that are difficult to understand.
The fact that living species did not gradually evolve from a single evolutionary process, but were created with their flawless forms in a single Cambrian explosion, has attracted the interest of scientists since Darwin's 1859.
Darwin wrote that all of a sudden, in which many genre groups appeared for the first time in our and P's form and with the absence of almost all, as is known at the time, about the shapes that are unusual.
Fossils contain undoubtedly very serious nature under Cambrian layers (Richard Ellis, evolutionary aquatic biologist).
Misrepresentations.
There is no need for more power, for lack of fossil record.
In some cases, this has happened in an almost uncontrollable amount, and the discoveries push back the unity ...
Fossil record so we continue to be mostly composed.
(T. Nevrille George, Professor of Archeology)
Darwinists never understand that the words "conclude that it is extremely difficult or rather impossible"
To see together in the distant past and in the distant future as a result of blind coincidence or necessity. Really belongs to Parles Darwin.
Darwinists claim that there are useless 98s
Step:9
Problems in Understanding ... Organs exist in the human body and they also exist in other living beings, however they do not even understand that these organs (Organs) had a misidentification in the past due to medical ignorance.
Organisms were lost, and in fact, they have very important functions, according to Darwin and his supporters.
Darwinists even insisted that a large portion of DNA was inactive, small.
Yet even evolutionists do not acknowledge that these claims of the past were born of scientific ignorance.
With the advances in the world of genetics, the functions of these genes have become more apparent.
Darwinists believe that the evolution of living species evolved from the evolution of different species, such as the Singing Birds (Finches) that live on the Galapagos Islands.
However, they do not realize that changes that occur at very small levels, such as differences between Finches' own beaks, cannot produce new biological information, such as organelles, and are therefore evidence against evolution.
Darwinists never understand that all the changes that are made in experiments on the bees have created only sick and ugly species. No useful or beneficial change has ever been observed.
Nor could new species be created under scientists during the transition.
Rather than providing evidence for evolution, it adds to the evidence that evolution never took place.
Were you told that there used to be horrible competitions with animals in music documentaries that made me tremble?"
Have you been taught, how is it a natural thing for a strong man to walk weak?
Did you even say shamelessly that since it is a law of nature, it also applies to human beings?
The fact is that the competition within the genres is 99
Step:10
Problems Understanding ... Fewer deaths occur among friend animals.
Usually limited, for example, if the fans were to fight again, they would both be fighting to the death.
When one party realizes that he cannot defeat the other.
He retreats from the competition.
The winner may feel a little proud for a while, but not all his life is proud of himself, and when he returns to normal, he returns to his majesty or to his friend for whom He took part in the fight, in the first case. (A. Murat Aytekin, Evolutionary Biologist)
Darwinists have never understood the fact that in terms of some fossils they take pictures of horses as Ancestors, much smaller comparisons as they were.
There can be no substitute for the kind of claims that evolutionists like, and that scientific claims are related to the evolution of the horse.
That the shapes of human fetuses (baby) pass through the mother's womb through the supposed evolutionary process as other living beings do.
Because the human embryo has embryos that have gills that disappear later.
But Haeckel turned to Fraud in his llustrations, attempting to present embryos in their respective alignments, altering them in their maps, to disprove his claim as scientific fraud Was given Darwinists claim that humans and apes are of the same superior race, and that there are fossils and fossils of the supposed Ape-Man.
They don't even understand, they are, whether they are one of the extinct species of monkeys or they belong to different human races and not to some kind of ape, 100
