Part(14)
Next to➡
Previous
Problems in understanding ... From Mendel and the Science of Genetics, which confirms the popularity of the 20th century, these inheritance laws were gradually repealed in later generations, in the tradition that the acquired traits are passed on.
Were Thus natural selection had lost its validity as an evolutionary mechanism.
Neo-Darwinism and the changes in the genres in search of a solution to the Darwin's ideology in the 1930s brought forward modern Synthetic Theory, commonly known as Neo-Darwinism.
Mutation Neo - Darwinism (incorporates mutations, which cause defects in the genes of living things due to external commands such as radio rays or mitochondrial defects, such as causes genes in Favorable Variations and Natural Mutations).
The model that represents evolution in the world today is Neo Darwinism - the theory that the living being is the result of a process that results in a number of complex organisms (ears, eyes, lungs, etc.).
Feathers etc.) have been undergoing changes due to genetic disorders. But there is an open scientific fact which completely refutes this theory.
Mutations stop the growth of living beings and they are always harmful.
The reason is very simple.
DNA has a very complex structure, so arithmetic effects can only damage it.
They are harmful because they are calculated 151
Page(2)
Problems that are difficult to understand ... in the structure of the genes of comparatively regular change, any modified change in an unusual rule and system, is dangerous, not welcome.
For example, an earthquake can shake a highly regulated structure, such as a building.
Not surprisingly, there is no example of a change that is useful, that is, one that I know can improve Genetic Codo.
All the changes have proved to be detrimental.
It was thought that mutation, presented as an evolutionary mechanism, is in fact a genetic event that harms living things and makes them ineffective.
I, of course, could be nothing more than a destructive mechanism.
However, an evolutionary mechanism of natural selection can do nothing of its own accord, as Darwin acknowledged.
This fact tells us that there is no evolutionary mechanism in nature.
There is no such thing as an evolutionary method that could have happened anywhere.
No sign of intermediate forms was found in the Fossil Record.
Clear evidence that the result, which was presented, did not find any intermediate form between the ancestors of the theory of evolution and the present generation in the Fossil Record.
Because according to this theory, all living species are descended from their predecessors.
One of the pre-existing species had changed into another after a long time and all the species have come into the world of existence in the same way.
In other words, in terms of the theory of evolution, this process of change has been going on for millions of years.
If this were true then there should have been numerous middle classes and they should have survived ... 152
Page (3)
Problems that were understood ... even during this long period of change but no such thing has been seen even in the fossil record.
For example, half the fish should have been sharpened in the past Then there are the characteristics of the beggar and the characteristics of the fish that he already had.
Or there must have been some reptiles, some feathers in addition to the reptiles that they already had.
Since B would have been in a transitional phase, he would have been, in a sense, a defective narrator whose remnants were not found in the record.
Evolutionists have referred to these imaginary creatures, which they believe are far away in the past as transitional forms.
If such animals had actually existed in the past, they would have been written down or in billions, in numbers and types.
More importantly, the remains of these strange creatures should have been in the Fossil Records.
But that was not the case.
Darwin explains in his book The Origin of Species that if my vision were a seed, the numerous intermediate forms that would have been more closely related to all species would have remained in the same group, with certainty.
Evidence of their first existence could be found only in the fossil remains.
Agraya was not seen.
However, Darwin was well aware that no fossil of these intermediate forms could be found.
He called this a great difficulty for his theory.
In a chapter of his book, Difficulties On Theory, he writes that, why, if genres are born, we do not see the transcendental forms of a large number of their transcendental forms everywhere.
Why isn't all power in the records confused, instead of the current genres we see?
Better a poor horse than no horse at all.
Page (4)
Problems with understanding ... problems?
Geologists have not been able to show with certainty that there is such a gradual organic chain, and that B is, perhaps, the most open and serious object that opposes this theory.
Darwin's hopes were dashed, however.
Although evolutionists have been working tirelessly to find fossils all over the world since the middle of the 19th century, no transitional form has yet been found.
All the fossils, against evolutionists, state that life suddenly appeared in perfect form on earth. Sammy Derek V.
Ager, a British archaeologist, said that he had to acknowledge the fact that, although he was an evolutionist, he still did.
Whether they are named at the Level of Orders or at the Level of Species, we find them again and again, not in terms of gradual evolution, but in the sudden emergence of one group at the expense of another.
This means that in Fossil Records, Suddenly, the figs were in perfect condition, with no intermediate shapes between them.
This was in stark contrast to Darwin's assumptions.
Moreover, this is a very strong proof that all living things have been created.
The only explanation for the fact that living species were extinct is the complete state in great detail, without any evolutionary limitation, given the fact that they were created.
This fact has been acknowledged by a very famous evolutionist and biologist, Douglas Futuyma.
Between creation and evolution, the possible explanations for the origin of living things have disappeared
Page (5)
Problems that occur in understanding ..... The living beings appeared in perfect condition with every detail.
If they had not been, they would have evolved from a slight change from the preceding species (Specias), but the distant Rica Rudd denies this if they had appeared in a complete state with every detail, they were in fact created.
Will be with some ingenious intelligence.
Fossils show that the creatures were upright on the ground in perfect condition.
This means that genres originated not from evolution, but from creation, contrary to Darwin's hypothesis.
The story of human evolution! One topic that has been frequently debated by proponents of the theory of evolution is the question of the origin of man.
Fans of Darwin's claim that the current man is Ingra is made up of ape-like creatures.
The evolutionary process of this misrepresentation is thought to have begun 4 to 5 million years ago, with some transitional forms being speculated between the present man and his imaginary ancestors.
In this imaginary sketch, the four species are given in the form of a list of species and life.
According to them, evolutionists call the ancestors of the first ape of modern man, such as Australopethicus, meaning the apes of South Africa.
Are 155 1.Australopethicus 2.
Homo Habilis 3.
Homo Erectus 4.
Homo Sapiens
Page (6)
Problems with understanding ... In fact, there are species of ancient monkeys that have become extinct over time, and nothing more.
Two internationally renowned Anatomists from England and America, Lord y | | 0 And Professor Charles Oxnard, after conducting extensive research on various specimens of Australopethicus, reveals that these were apes belonging to the species of ape-monkeys that became extinct over time and have no resemblance to modern man.
Were Evolutionists, in the name of human evolution, classify the second type of stage as Homo, that is, of a human being.
According to their claim, the living thing that matters to them. Come in the Homo Series, more advanced than Australopethicus.
Evolutionists devised an imaginative evolutionary scheme to find different fossils in a specific order of their creatures.
This scheme was imaginary because it was never proved that there was an evolutionary relationship between these different classes - Ernst Mayr has been a very important evolutionist of the 20th century, admits in his book, 'One In the Long Argument, "especially historical puzzles, such as the beginning of life or Homo sapiens, are extraordinarily difficult and may not be healed even after reaching the final conclusion."
Evolutionists conclude from link chain sketches such as Australopethicus>
Homo Habilis>
Homo Erectus>
Homo Sapiens that each of these genres has a higher value than the other.
However, recent archaeological discoveries reveal that Homo Habilis' Australopethicus and Homo Erectus lived in different parts of the world at the same time.
In addition, a special class of human beings who are classified as Homo that their Zuekerman 156
Page (7)
Problems in understanding ... Erectus has been around until very recently.
Homo sapiens Neandar Thalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens - the area in which human beings live together.
This condition seems to indicate the futility of the claim that they are each other's ancestors. Stephen Jay Gould describes this uncertainty as the Dead Lock of Evolution, even though he himself was one of the leading evolutionary leaders of the 20th century: The three Naseemi series living together belong to the same family.
None of Australopethecus, A Africanus, the Robust and H.
Habilis are explicitly mentioned; none of the other During A brief outline of human evolution that is maintained with the help of various drawings that tell some half-monkeys, half-human creatures and what is shown in the media and in human books, are all open propaganda.
Sources They are nothing but a story without a scientific basis.
U.K.
Lord Solly was one of the most famous and respected scientists of Zuekerman, who continued his research on the subject for many years and continued to study Australopethicus fossils for 15 years, finally coming to the conclusion that Being an evolutionist himself, he said: There is, in fact, no family tree in which creatures like apes have been related to man.
Zuekerman has created an interesting Spectrum of Science which begins with what is considered scientific and ends with what used to be unscientific. 157
Page (8)
Problems to Understand ... According to Zuekerman's Spectrum, the more scientific one is the one that relies on solid facts.
Fields of science consisting of physics and chemistry.
This is followed by the number of biological sciences and then the whole of science at the end of the spectrum which is considered to be mostly unscientific.
In which there are extra-sensory concepts such as telepathy, ie mental seizure and sixth sense and finally human evolution.
Zuekerman explains his theories: We are then formed, and beyond the imaginary truth that goes into the fields of biological sciences, which are the superficial senses or the interpreters of the history of human fossils, where the faithful evolutionists are close.
Anything is possible.
And where the zealot and the believer in evolution are sometimes able to believe in many contradictions at the same time.
The history of human evolution is not worth anything, but it does have some interesting explanations for some of the fossils that were excavated from some people who were attached to these theories.
The Darwinian formula, apart from all the technical evidence we've come up with so far, has to be examined once and for all. Are The theory of evolution emphasizes that life is created by chance.
According to this irrational claim, inanimate and unconscious gems come close to each other to make the cell and then somehow created living beings, including human beings, we have to think about it.
When we bring near the elements that are the building blocks of life, such as carbs, phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium, it becomes just a heap.
This thing 158
Page (9)
Problems in Understanding ... No matter what stages this pile goes through, it cannot form a pile of gems, not even a single living thing.
If you like, we have to set up an experiment on this subject, and we have to examine the evolutionists to see if they really claim, without stating the Darwinian formula.
Under Evolutionists eat the core of two things that are involved in the formation of living things, which are phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, iron, and tetanus ... in large barrels.
Additionally, there is nothing in Barels that does not exist under normal conditions, but they are important to me.
Add them as much as you want in this mixture of amino acids and proteins.
Each of them has a probability of becoming 1 in 10950. As they like Let them go through as much heat and moisture as they want.
Waiting for these specialists, one after the other, near these barrels, for billions or even trillions of years.
Leave them free to use all the conditions they deem necessary to form a human being.
It doesn't matter what they do.
They cannot produce a human from these papules, says a professor who examines the structure of the cell with an electronic microscope.
They can't produce giraffes, flies, burrows, yellow bubbles, horses, dolphins, roses, meadows, lilies, olives, grapes, peaches, peacocks, hawks, squirrels, millions of other creatures and creatures. In fact, they (Evolutionists have not been able to obtain a single cell of any of these organisms. Short, unconscious gems cannot combine to form a single cell.
They cannot make a new decision, nor can they divide a cell into two parts.
Can change, nor can others make other decisions
Page (10)
Problems that cannot be understood ... and created by professors who first invent the microscope and examine the structure of their own cells, under this microscope.
And those who discover that matter is unconscious.
It happens, lifeless pile and it is enlightened with life by Allah's supernatural creation.
The theory of evolution, on the other hand, claims to be the opposite of a completely outdated idea that life began on its own, which goes completely against reason.
If we think a little bit about the claims of evolutionists, then the fact is obvious, as shown in the example above, that everything has been created.
Eye and ear technology is another topic that evolutionists are unable to answer.
That is an unanswerable answer.
In the form of the eye and the ear of the inverted senses, we have to answer briefly from the subject of the eye in its passage, a question of how we see.
Rays of light that come from an object fall backwards on the retina of the eye.
Here these rays of light are converted by the cells in the electric cylinders and reach a small spot on the back of the transmitter which is the center of vision.
These electrons are seen in the center after going through a number of processes as an idea.
With this telly background we have to think of something. Sent is insulated for light.
This means that there is complete darkness inside, and no light can reach the place where it is sitting.
In this way, even the center of the eye does not come in contact with light and it can be a very dark place.
Probably you have to go to such a place.
In any case, you are at the center of this deep star of one enlightened and enlightened world. 1
